{"id":246,"date":"2017-07-13T15:48:05","date_gmt":"2017-07-13T14:48:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rballoul-avocat.fr\/?p=246"},"modified":"2017-07-13T16:21:38","modified_gmt":"2017-07-13T15:21:38","slug":"refere-provision-la-creance-de-lassure-pour-laquelle-lassureur-dommage-ouvrage-a-reconnu-sa-garantie-nest-pas-serieusement-contestable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rballoul-avocat.fr\/index.php\/2017\/07\/13\/refere-provision-la-creance-de-lassure-pour-laquelle-lassureur-dommage-ouvrage-a-reconnu-sa-garantie-nest-pas-serieusement-contestable\/","title":{"rendered":"R\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9-provision : la cr\u00e9ance de l&rsquo;assur\u00e9 pour laquelle l&rsquo;assureur dommage-ouvrage a reconnu sa garantie n&rsquo;est pas s\u00e9rieusement contestable !"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Publication dans la semaine juridique des collectivit\u00e9s territoriales, aux \u00e9ditions LEXIS NEXIS, relative \u00e0 l&rsquo;ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9-provision rendue par la Cour administrative d&rsquo;appel de Nancy le 22 f\u00e9vrier 2017 (n\u00b0 16NC02565, Cie Allianz c\/ Centre hospitalier de Pfastatt).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dans cette d\u00e9cision, le juge consid\u00e8re que la cr\u00e9ance de l&rsquo;assur\u00e9 \u00e0 l&rsquo;encontre de son assureur, issue de l&rsquo;obligation de ce dernier de pr\u00e9financer les travaux de lev\u00e9e des r\u00e9serves ne pr\u00e9sente pas un caract\u00e8re s\u00e9rieusement contestable en raison de l&rsquo;absence de caract\u00e8re d\u00e9finitif du d\u00e9compte g\u00e9n\u00e9ral et de ce que la prescription biennale applicable aux contrats d&rsquo;assurance n&rsquo;\u00e9tait pas acquise.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Publication dans la semaine juridique des collectivit\u00e9s territoriales, aux \u00e9ditions LEXIS NEXIS, relative \u00e0 l&rsquo;ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9-provision rendue par la Cour administrative d&rsquo;appel de Nancy le 22 f\u00e9vrier 2017 (n\u00b0 16NC02565, Cie Allianz c\/ Centre hospitalier de Pfastatt). Dans cette d\u00e9cision, le juge consid\u00e8re que la cr\u00e9ance de l&rsquo;assur\u00e9 \u00e0 l&rsquo;encontre de son assureur, issue [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":247,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rballoul-avocat.fr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rballoul-avocat.fr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rballoul-avocat.fr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rballoul-avocat.fr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rballoul-avocat.fr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=246"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/rballoul-avocat.fr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":256,"href":"https:\/\/rballoul-avocat.fr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246\/revisions\/256"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rballoul-avocat.fr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/247"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rballoul-avocat.fr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=246"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rballoul-avocat.fr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=246"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rballoul-avocat.fr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=246"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}